Comments on: Architectual Styles – Part Three : Domains http://www.brianlegros.com/blog/2007/08/09/architectual-styles-part-three-domains/ eat, program, and be merry Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:48:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Brian LeGros http://www.brianlegros.com/blog/2007/08/09/architectual-styles-part-three-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-106 Brian LeGros Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:44:13 +0000 http://www.brianlegros.com/blog/2007/08/09/architectual-styles-part-three-domains/#comment-106 @Luis - Thanks for the encouragement. This series will focus on architectual styles, but I could post about some of the ways I organize my applications. I'll focus on my preferences again, so hopefully it'll help some. But if not, I claim ignorance and will delete this comment ;) @Luis – Thanks for the encouragement. This series will focus on architectual styles, but I could post about some of the ways I organize my applications. I’ll focus on my preferences again, so hopefully it’ll help some. But if not, I claim ignorance and will delete this comment ;)

]]> By: Luis Majano http://www.brianlegros.com/blog/2007/08/09/architectual-styles-part-three-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-105 Luis Majano Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:09:13 +0000 http://www.brianlegros.com/blog/2007/08/09/architectual-styles-part-three-domains/#comment-105 Hey Brian, great post, I like the example of the search and I also kinda lean to more semantics than reuse. It just makes the maintenance easier to my eyes. I also find that my domain objects don't become so utterly detached that I end up with tons and tons of small pieces. I sometimes prefer to have some beefed domain objects. To my eyes, sometimes this classes become decorators of a basic data type in order to increase my purposes. Keep em coming. It would be great if you did a package analysis and design post. This is an area that I really struggle with as to how to organize your domain. Hey Brian,

great post, I like the example of the search and I also kinda lean to more semantics than reuse. It just makes the maintenance easier to my eyes. I also find that my domain objects don’t become so utterly detached that I end up with tons and tons of small pieces. I sometimes prefer to have some beefed domain objects.

To my eyes, sometimes this classes become decorators of a basic data type in order to increase my purposes.

Keep em coming. It would be great if you did a package analysis and design post. This is an area that I really struggle with as to how to organize your domain.

]]>