what do I know

With my latest employer, I have taken the big dive into the .NET world. I’ve spent most of my career working with ColdFusion, Java, PHP, Flex and dabbled a little bit in the Ruby/Rails and Groovy/Grails world in addition to the obvious set of web technologies and standards that span all of these application languages. My limited experience with .NET was through some undergraduate and graduate work I did with C# as well as helping (if you can call it that) with an ASP.NET a long time ago with a colleague of mine. I am a application developer; even though I dabble in lots of different areas, the bulk of my knowledge is building applications in a corporate IT environment. I focus on implementing business requirements and managing technical concerns as it relates to the software development process. I’ve had jobs in the past associated with business and management roles but at the core I am a plain and simple application developer. As I’ve been getting my hands dirty in .NET over the last few months I figured I’d share some of my initial impressions. Please keep in mind, I may be looking at a lot of things in a very naive light, so read what I have as my opinion, ignorant or not.

With context out of the way, I have to say that so far working with .NET hasn’t been a negative experience. There is the whole you’re stuck with Windows thing, but since I’m in fully entrenched in the MS world now, I’ve been able to get past it. There have definitely been some nuances to get used to, but nothing extremely difficult to overcome. Here are a few comments on some of the things I’ve run into thus far:

• Namespaces in C# aren’t constrained by the file system with respect to partitioning your code. Initially this seemed like a nice decoupling, but I’ve found myself forming more of a dependency on tools to navigate my classes hierarchy rather than just looking into a folder.
• There is no notion of a shared class path as there is in Java. If you want to get a hold of an assembly to use in your application you’ve got to find it and pull it in. I think there is a configuration option on an assembly that you can use to help, but I haven’t had any experience using it.
• Assemblies are pretty nice build artifacts. Versioning is addressed out of the box and integrated with the .NET framework. I’m not sure how they stack up against something like OSGI, but I’m enjoying having them around.
• Everyone says the implementation for generics is better in C# than Java, but as an application developer I don’t notice a difference except that I’ve been told I can use reflection on them in C#. C# also seems to have made a much larger use of them in their core over Java. It seems like stronger typing is a very important practice in the C# world than in my experience with the Java world, but that is probably biased based on how I’ve used Java.
• There appears to be a very balanced view on uses for metadata (attributes) in .NET. Annotations in the Java world were a great addition to the language, but sometimes their use comes off as abuse; look at a JUnit 4 test suite class for a great example.
• There are lots of accepted libraries available that are direct ports from the Java community such as NUnit, NAnt, Spring.NET, CruiseControl.NET, NDocs, log4net, etc. Getting comfortable with these libraries was pretty easy since I’d had experience with the Java equivalents.
• The help systems in .NET leave much to be desired and make me long for Javadocs, Livedocs, RDoc, or anything else. I find myself clicking through a class definitions on MSDN and after two or three links I can finally get to a list of “members” that belong to a class, only to click another link to load another page to see more about the details of that “member”. I have yet to find any easily usable API documentation.
• .NET has a solid component model available out of the box. WCF is a really simple and tight implementation of a component architecture. Service-orientation is a focus with an emphasis on abstracting away protocols, execution environments, and exposing metadata for a more contractual usage. It has the feel of being an API built around WSDL 2 and many of the WS-* standards, but it goes by many of the concepts, although not by name, identified in Patterns of Enterprise Integration. It’s compatible with synchronous and asynchronous operations and did I mention simple to use? I hope to do some posting about it later.
• Getting used to assimilating applications into the bowels of the OS seems to be core to the .NET mentality. This is probably just a matter of perspective for the developer, but based on the examples I’ve seen thus far, the user folder, the registry, and Windows\system32 folder are popular hang outs for lots of applications. I’ve been met by quite a looks of confusion when I mention deploying applications without the use of some type of installer. There is a lot of power that you get from this tight coupling with the OS I’ve been told. Unlike my previous shops, writing cross-platform applications doesn’t seem to be a priority for .NET developers, so tight coupling it is.
• It took me listening to the episode of SER with Anders Hejlsberg to understand better it, but it appears to be that developing in .NET is meant to be an IDE integrated experience via Visual Studio. Regardless of the aspect of development I’ve worked with in .NET thus far, the development experience has been fairly consistent. There is always some visual representation of the code available (where applicable) and a debugger is always around and working no matter the context (desktop, web, etc.). At first it was so simple that I felt like I was missing something, but from what I have read and heard, as much work goes into VS as does the .NET framework, if not more. If anyone has used Netbeans for Java web development, it’s a very similar experience in terms of its integration with the environment.
• I’ve always seen code insight as a supplemental thing, relying on documentation for the majority of my work, but wow, code insight (intellisense) seems to be the major crutch on which a lot of .NET developers place themselves within VS. What’s weird is that I don’t notice anything different than what you’ll experience when working with Eclipse and Java, in fact, the code insight seems to be limited to code only. I have yet to run into a situation where the IDE makes a suggestion on how something could be written or changed as IntelliJ does for Java. I will admit though, maybe I’m missing something.
• The visual editors in VS seemed to get abused by .NET developers. I say abuse because quite a few .NET developers I’ve encountered can’t talk to me about their code in any other context but how they dragged-and-dropped controls onto a screen and edited properties. Since I don’t know the in’s and out’s of the tools quite yet, having a conversation is tough. I try to communicate in terms of language agnostic principles and patterns but most of the time all I get are blank stares and judgmental comments about how I am over complicating things.
• MS alternatives exist in terms of the IDE and runtime, but they don’t seem to be popular at all. I really like SharpDevelop as an alternative to Visual Studio. It’s clean, easy to use, and integrates with a lot of OSS packages out of the box. Mono is available as a Linux-based .NET runtime that has a lot of .NET developers excited because of its potential to allow them to code for the Mac. I don’t know any Mac owners that have Mono installed however, so I don’t know if it’s really a viable cross-platform solution.
• I have some thoughts on ASP.NET web forms that I want to share, but I’ll save that for my next post.
• The developer community has always been important to me and I feel it’s always important to remain active in the community in some capacity. As I’ve begun attending the local .NET user group meetings, I don’t see a lot of topics that are not MS centric. There is no question that MS drives the releases of the .NET framework, but there have been lots of innovations coming out of the community that deserve attention. It feels like there are only a small minority of developers that actually utilize these contributions locally. I have yet to see any presentations on the various unit testing tools, build tools, ORM, IoC, etc. that have come out of this space. I do envy the direct support that MS has for its user groups, but I wonder if my expectations are too high.

In any case, so far the learning curve with .NET hasn’t been very steep and when I do get to code I feel fairly productive. I should be posting in the next few days on my thoughts about ASP.NET web forms so I’m sure that will get me flamed, but it’s a major part of the puzzle I’m having to work with that I feel needs some attention. Until next time.

Well, looks like I made it through the April Adogo meeting with both my presentations on BlazeDS. I put quite a bit of work into the presentations, so thanks to all of those who attended the presentation. We’ve updated the Meetings page with links to the recordings if anyone is interested. I have to apologize for the quality of the sound, however; I think I accidentally messed up the white noise calibration. In any case, thanks to the Adogo for having me as always.

Well I’ve finally put the finishing touches on my Adogo presentation for tomorrow night on the “Mechanics of BlazeDS” and “Remoting and Messaging with BlazeDS”. I originally called the 2nd presentation “RPC and Messaging with BlazeDS”, but I didn’t have an opportunity to integrate SOAP/REST into the picture, so I’m renaming it. In any case, I was able to throw together a pretty cool little sample app that should allow for some audience participation (pending my laptop can spare the memory). Hopefully some of my former co-workers from CFI can make it out. Sebastian and I will be driving out right after work, so see you all there.

Also, there will be food this time around thanks to TekSystems, so worst case, come out, be fed, and ridicule my meager presentations.

It’s been a while since I’ve presented at the Adogo, so I figure I owe the group a couple of presentations. Based on the feedback we’ve been getting from the mailing list, I’m going to take a little bit of a different approach to this month’s meeting. We’re going to do 2, 30 minute presentations, one focusing on the conceptual and one focusing on the practical. The topics this month will be “The Mechanics of BlazeDS” (conceptual) and “RPC and Messaging Using BlazeDS” (practical). For those of you who are interested in seeing how Java will integrate with Flex, I will be showing off how to integrate POJO’s for use with RPC.

Hopefully I can keep the presentations short and the content simple and interesting. If anyone decides to stop by, make sure to hold me to that goal during the meeting. Primers should be posted soon. See you on April 1st, same time and place as always.

Marcel Overkijk has taken advantage of the recent open sourcing of Flex to provide a plug-in for the Grails framework to expose AMF endpoints from your Grails application. The AMF end points are created via a service class in Grails. Grails, being built on Groovy, can very easily utilize any Java code, requires little work to configure, and can bundle a WAR for you with a single command. The plug-in looks really promising as does its road map which looks like it will have tools comparable to some of the other remoting packages available for Flex. This plug-in is built for use with BlazeDS, Adobe’s recent open sourcing of a subset of its LiveCycle Data Services product. Although I haven’t tried it yet (and its not recommended for production use), this is a great option to dumping a bunch of JARs into a shared Flex context or trying to setup your own BlazeDS server. Why not let Grails (and this plug-in) do the work for you? Seems like a much easier deployment option, IMO.

I’m also excited to look at Marcel’s code to see if I can learn anything to help in the implementation of an idea I had a while back regarding a Java factory for Flex to create objects from JSR 223 compatible languages using Java’s new script invocation API.

Thanks for the hard work Marcel! I look forward to messing around with the plug-in.

A couple months ago a few of us at work thought it would be worth looking into some of the newer programming languages and frameworks that have been receiving a lot of buzz. We were particularly interested in some of the productivity boosts that have been preached as a result of using these solutions. We decided to focus on the creation of a proof-of-concept (PoC) for one of our major web sites (sort of a stripped down CMS solution). The PoC consisted of two implementations, one using Groovy and Grails, and one using Ruby on Rails. On the Ruby side of things, we decided to look into JRuby, rather than the MRI or Rubinus implementations, since the majority of our development efforts rely on the JVM. Based on the success of this process, we are even open to considering these technologies as a possible replacement for ColdFusion and its assortment of frameworks that we currently use in our web tier.

I decided to move forward with Groovy and Grails in the first implementation. Its syntax seemed to be the most like Java which is what I am most comfortable with. I spent about 4 weeks learning the basics needed for Groovy and the Grails framework. From the little I’ve used it, I really like Groovy as a language. Learning Groovy was a cinch. The availability of closures, the use of builders to simplify configuration, and the emulation of formal properties using Groovy Beans are all great features. After seeing the amount of work being put into Groovy Swing integration, I can’t think why anyone would want to write a Swing UI in straight Java again; the syntax was just as simple as MXML without the markup. I am curious if any classpath conflicts would occur between dependencies in Groovy and our own projects, but I didn’t look into this any.

As far as Grails goes, I am really impressed at the work put into combining the technology stack on which the framework is based. The biggest and most notable feature I like is its tight integration with GORM. The use of GORM as the relational mapper truly makes working with the database effortless. Integration with legacy databases is fairly simple if you want to re-use your Hibernate mapping files, or if you want to do the configuration yourself in your domain classes. Because of GORM, you can approach pretty much any web application focusing solely on your object model; our shop follows this practice already as do most Java shops, so this is a big plus. On the templating side of things, I am pleased to see the work put into GSP. One of the main reasons we went with ColdFusion was because of the simplicity it provided over JSP, so GSP is a welcome attempt at change. Another feature I really like about Grails is the ability to create service classes to hook into, and expose, JEE endpoints with the utmost of ease. I didn’t get a chance to play with these, but from what I’ve seen in the plug-in section, it looks like working with JMS, SOAP, JTA, and a few other standards is ridiculously simple. Yet another feature I really enjoyed was the integration with Spring Web Flow. The scoping in Grails seems so natural; flows are very simple to construct and alleviate a lot of the hacking most developers have to put up with in the session scope. Finally, bundling an application into a WAR is provided out of the box so creating a Grails app and dropping it on your favorite JEE server is fairly effortless. From the little I got to work with the Grails framework, you can tell the team’s focus is clearly to improve Java in the web tier and they are on the right track. I know offering Spring integration is definitely a big draw for me since we use it so heavily in most of our initiatives.

Keeping in mind I worked with Grails 1.0 RC1, I did run into some difficulties with the framework. The first and biggest frustration I encountered was when working with domain classes. When I changed a domain class, while the built-in Jetty server was running, the server would attempt to reload the Spring context but just hang. As a result, I would have to take about 30s or so ever time I changed a domain class to bounce the built-in Jetty server. I’m not sure if this has been fixed since I played with it, but this really deterred me from working with Grails. One thing that I got frustrated with was what seems like a limitation in GSP. I wanted to create a view to edit a domain class which had a one-to-many relationship with another class. A pre-selected multi-select list box seemed like the perfect HTML widget to use. I was unable to find a way to automatically have GSP generate this for me. I searched the user forums, but I only found a post that said an implementation wasn’t available at that time. I didn’t search for a JSP library that may help, but maybe this could have been a viable alternative short of writing the code to render the HTML myself.

So after the Groovy and Grails experience, I dove into JRuby and Rails. Being that I scare easily at the sight of anything new, a colleague recommended Dave Thomas’ Rails book to get started; I also had other colleagues as resources to help in times of need. Since I’ve become more familiar with the Ruby syntax I must say there are some language aspects I do like. Mixins available at the language level are a lot handier than I would have thought, especially in the context of Rails. Properties and module level methods were nice to work with as well. I can definitely see where the “enough rope to hang yourself” analogy comes from however; I encountered a lot of variations on how to syntactically accomplish the same task. From a configuration standpoint, I also had to do some work to setup my environment. In the end, I had to pull down JRuby (1.03) and install the rails (1.2.6), activerecord-jdbc-adapter, and warbler gems as well as update my JDBC driver. Since JRuby is just an implementation of the Ruby language, however, I was able to use any Ruby reference, tutorial, or example I could find and had no issues.

As far as Rails goes, I was pleasantly surprised by how easy it was to get started. One of the biggest things I like about the framework is the inclusion of data migrations. You are required to interact with the database at a certain granularity but those interactions are abstracted by writing Ruby code. I’m not necessarily a fan of this granularity, but from a maintenance perspective, this is one of the best solutions I’ve encountered for managing an application’s database. I am also glad to see to see the FormOptionsHelper class. When data binding isn’t sufficient, the FormOptionsHelper class provides a lot of convenience methods to help work with select boxes. Tasks such as pre-populating a multi-select list box were extremely simple using options_from_collection_for_select. Lastly, I really liked the work done to integrate the use of REST into the framework. Working with ActiveResource seems fairly straightforward and doesn’t require as much configuration as I expected; that being said I haven’t worked much with this feature yet.

Based on my limited experience with JRuby and Rails, there were a few things of which I am wary. I haven’t looked into this much, but having two language cores available in JRuby freaks me out a bit. Without guidance or standards, I can definitely see a junior developer using Java implementations when Ruby ones are available forming a strange mixture of code. Another point to watch is the current maturity of the tools to migrate a Rails application to the JEE platform. ActiveRecord JDBC and Warbler are still under active development (although close to 1.0 releases) and it did take quite a bit of investigation to get my PoC working with our existing environment. Additionally, I don’t like ERB as a templating language. This is a personal preference, but it reminds me of PHP which I dislike for its heavy use of scriptlets; I really prefer using tag-based markup for templating. Finally, and probably the biggest thing I don’t like, is Rails’ implementation of ActiveRecord. ActiveRecord is cripplingly associated with the relational model rather than your application’s object model. A simple relationship such as belongs_to doesn’t relate to a composition relationship between a parent and child object, it relates to which tables contains the foreign key in your relational model. I designed my PoC with an object model in mind and had quite a bit of frustration, semantically speaking, trying to migrate that model into the mold for ActiveRecord. I felt like my focus was on the database for the most part and that seemed contrary to the goal of the framework.

Ok, so enough for my probably useless feedback, let me tell you what we decided to do. My personal preference lies with Groovy and Grails. The side of me that needs a solution in the immediate however, led to my choose JRuby on Rails. Let me explain. When I worked with Groovy and Grails, my learning curve wasn’t with the language, but with the framework. I found myself having lots of difficulty accomplishing tasks that I had expected to be fairly effortless. I associate a lot of these difficulties with the current state of the Grails framework. This is not meant to come off with a negative connotation, but with the perspective that Grails is the “new kid on the block” and still needs polish. When I worked with JRuby on Rails, the learning curve was with the language, not the framework. Rails met my expectations regarding the work needed to accomplish my goals (short of the ActiveRecord hoopla). Rails has the current advantage over Grails since it’s had the opportunity to be exposed to its community for 2 major iterations now. Getting an environment configured and working is a one time cost; I don’t count this again JRuby on Rails although it was easier to manage with Groovy and Grails. Additionally, running on JRuby provides us with the minimal level of Java integration that we need to re-use our existing architecture. JRuby 1.1’s focus on performance and very eminent release as well as Eclipse tooling support via RADRails are also an added plus.

So that’s the verdict from my PoC, but its not the end of my opinion. Anyone who has read this far and thinks I’m full of shit, ignore this next paragraph unless you want to flame me. I ultimately believe that Groovy and Grails will win out for the majority of users utilizing Java in the web tier. All of the arguments I have made for JRuby on Rails are based around the availability and maturity of its resources. These are arenas in which Groovy and Grails have just recently entered into competition. Groovy is quickly becoming the alternative for those in the Java community who are looking for a syntax with which they are more comfortable that brings a dynamic flare. Although it may have helped, Grails doesn’t seem to have the influence yet to cause the recent spike in popularity that Groovy has received as compared to what Rails did for Ruby. I think Java interop will also become more of an issue as people begin using languages running on the JVM. From the little I’ve seen, I really like Groovy’s approach, it feels familiar. I also think developers, like myself, are looking for re-use from the Java libraries and frameworks that we’ve relied on and with which we have experience. Grails’ tight integration with Spring, Hibernate, and other JEE standards (defacto or not) will make these approaches even simpler. It seems like since Grails explicitly chose to support the enterprise and Rails is choosing to stay out of it. I think Grails over time will have more to offer than Rails for those looking for new solutions on web that are currently using Java. Please keep in mind I’m not saying that Groovy/Grails isn’t currently ready for the enterprise (despite the FUD going around). As I understand it, many have been successful by using these technologies; I’m just saying I’m going to wait a while and see how others have been successful and learn from their examples.

In the end, I definitely think these new languages and frameworks provide a huge amount of productivity compared to how we are currently building applications for the web at the office. Tooling definitely needs some work on the Eclipse side of things, but Netbeans and IntelliJ are providing some great alternatives in the interim. I’m really looking forward to using JRuby and Rails to create our stripped down CMS application, which has recently received the green light. I’m even more excited about continuing to work with Groovy and Grails as their communities grow (and even pushing for its use in the office). Thank you to LaForge, Rocher, Nutter, Bini, and everyone else who has contributed their time and hard work into making Java on the web productive (and fun). I really see potential in the languages being built for the JVM and can’t wait to see what the future holds.

NOTE: Sorry to Jython, Django, Scala, and Lift for not including you in this PoC. For now I’ve spread my wings enough to be dangerous, and by dangerous I mean screw up enough software to retain job security. I hope to find the time later this year to do some more exploring.

Recently at work we’ve been using a lot of ORM solutions on the Java side for our service APIs. Our intent is to focus the interaction we have with our DB resources to that of object persistence rather than ad-hoc data access. So technology-wise the transition has involved going from Spring JDBC to things like iBatis and Hibernate.

To take a step back, let me qualify what I consider to be object persistence versus data access. I see data access as the direct use of a data model (e.g. - relation model via an RDBMS, hierarchical model via XML, etc), by an application. Typically I categorize data access code as code that working directly with the data model’s query language (e.g. - SQL, XQuery/XPath, etc). Now, it usually benefits me when working in an object-oriented paradigm to find some type of mapping between the data model and the application’s object model, which is where I see the desire to migrate to an object persistence paradigm for data access. In fact, I consider object persistence just a subset and abstraction of the term data access I’ve defined above. For me object persistence implies that data access is distilled into a simple set of conventions and/or configurable options to allows objects from an application’s domain to gain basic CRUD (create, read, updated, delete) behaviors. In my mind, a few popular patterns for object persistence come to mind (ActiveRecord and Data Mapper) but I get the impression that what is perceived as a mature object persistence solution is a solution which completely abstracts the means by which to directly interact with the data model.

I don’t necessarily think object persistence is a bad solution, in fact, I can see a lot of productivity coming from a reduced set of work when building an integration layer into your application. What I wonder about is the following:

1. When an object persistence solution should be selected for use with an application.
2. The amount of productivity gained from using an object persistence solution.
3. The degree to which an object persistence solution should abstract direct data access.

Let’s take the example of an application being developed from scratch without an existing relational model. I think the 3 points from above are easily answered by looking at how popular the Rails framework has become. I think when building an application anew, having an abstraction for the relational model is great approach. As a developer you can focus solely on your object model which, in my opinion, ideally means more time for working on modeling a domain and deciding on your application’s architecture versus how its persisted.

Unfortunately, I think a majority of shops that like to apply the “enterprise” buzzword to their software infrastructure, don’t have a luxury of building their data models from scratch. Let’s take the example of building an application from scratch using an existing relational model. For this example I think there are a few divisions I have to make before forming my analysis:

1. The relational model was constructed focusing on standards (i.e. - SQL DDL) and over time has become fairly normalized.
2. The relational model was constructed utilizing vendor specific objects and over time have become fairly normalized.
3. The relational model was constructed utilizing standards and vendor specific objects and over time has become more disheveled than normalized.

For the first division, I think an object persistence solution is extremely useful. In my opinion, using a solution that implements the Data Mapper pattern will result in productivity because the implication is that the data access being performed isn’t that complicated. I also think that abstracting out direct data access may be beneficial so that it motivates the keepers of the relational model to maintain all of the work they’ve put into normalization moving forward.

For the second division, I think similar assumptions can be made as they were for the first division. From what I can tell it seems like most “mature” object persistence solutions provide you a means by which to work with vendor specific objects (e.g. - stored procedures, custom objects, rules, etc). I think normalization will save the day as long as the vendor objects in the relational model don’t contain business logic which hasn’t found its way into your application when it should.

This point I feel leads us to the third division; your shit is all mixed up from a relational perspective. I think object persistence can still be considered for use with an application of this type, but the complexity of the application should come into play as well when making the decision. I think a great gauge of whether or not to go the object persistence route is the complexity of your domain. If I find that I’ve got 2 domain classes with a simple composition relationship, I don’t think using an object persistence solution is going to make me productive; heck, the domain may even be overkill. As far as direct data access goes, if normalization isn’t there to provide some structure to the relational model, the implication, at least in my company’s case, is that vendor objects were used to supplement the benefits you get from normalization. This means that business logic that possibly should be contained in the application is tucked away in a vendor object; short of rewriting that vendor object, you may need to reuse the functionality it provides. Direct data access at this point is the only option from what I can tell (e.g. - you need to use an inline non-deterministic SQL function as criteria for a join clause in a SELECT statement). From what I’ve seen in iBatis, object persistence with direct data access is definitely a real and usable option.

As one final point, I think utilizing an object persistence solution, especially in this third division, needs to be approached with a lot of caution when dealing with an existing data model. The forces that drove the creation of the existing data model are not the forces that are driving the creation of the application with which you need to integrate. From what I can tell, in the implementations I seen at work, the object persistence API can definitely start to drive, at a minimum, the way the application domain is being constructed. I’m not just talking about semantics, I’m also talking about data encapsulation and relationships. From what I can tell, based on your architectural approach (e.g. - fat models), this can result in a some pretty strange object behaviors emerging. I don’t have any good examples, so that pretty much just makes this paragraph bunk, so hack these last few sentences up to an opinion. I would encourage readers, however, to do my work for me; show me some examples where you find this to be true.

Overall, I really like the idea of using object persistence in my applications, if I feel the complexity of the application and the data model being used warrant it. I do think sometimes that ORM tools are overused, but as employed developers I still think it comes back to finding the right set of tools for the job and being productive. If object persistence isn’t going to fulfill those requirements, just remember that it’s ok to not use one.

NOTE : I read a really good blog post about ActiveRecord and Rails yesterday that motivated me to finish this post. Even though this post isn’t about patterns in object persistence, I think it’s a great read if you have some time.

So today I noticed that my blog got way too many hits from being listed on the Blog section of TheServerSide.com. I even got a comment on the post from the project lead for Grails, which was pretty cool. So needless to say, I had Groovy on the brain on my drive home from work.

I started to think about the use of remote objects in Flex. We use Java to integrate with Flex at the office and I know it’s use with ColdFusion has been a big hit too. This got me to thinking, if Flex can support Java classes, what’s to say that it can’t support Groovy or JRuby or Jython or Rhino or whatever language that falls under the scope of JSR 223? I know Groovy and JRuby can be compiled to Java byte code so why can’t these classes be used as remote objects by Flex? I’m still new to Groovy and JRuby, but I’d assume the only obstacle to integrating the these technologies would be the Java interface exposed by these languages after compilation. Then it clicked in my head, the new javax.script package would normalize this interface to make it easier for developers to integrate. Also, if someone didn’t have Java 6 available, the bean scripting framework (BSF) could just as easily accomplish this goal. Additionally, if remote objects are possible, I have to wonder about how possible it may be to use the RemoteClass metadata to trigger the AMF gateway to play nice.

All of this being said, I’m excited about the possibility of integrating other languages, based on the JVM, into Flex. I know WebOrb has a few options available for .NET, PHP, and RoR apps but my (very limited) understanding is that those integrations are somewhat native to each language. It seems like a very simple layer of abstraction could be written to allow these compiled Java classes to be made available as remote objects in Flex. I can, however, understand why there hasn’t been that much written about the use of classes from scripting languages, based on the JVM, being used as remote objects. Lifecycle Data Services or CF server are required to use remote objects in Flex, from what I understand. I would assume that web services, SOAP and REST-based, are the preferred choice for users of open-source Flex in terms of integration.

Maybe there will be some interest in this topic; maybe Adobe already has adapter built (I didn’t Google that much about the topic as of yet) to address these concerns. Who knows, maybe I’ll get off my tail and actually write some sample code that solves this problem. In any case, out of the box support for any of the scripting languages supported on the JVM would definitely be a cool feature in Flex.

Ok, I’m a ColdFusion/Java programmer. I like ColdFusion for the web-tier, but sometimes I feel its way to verbose. I like Java for the application tier but I’m not a fan of static typing and some of the things that Java brings with it (i.e. - checked exceptions). I’ve been hearing/reading a lot of cool stuff about dynamic types in .NET, all of the cool stuff that Ruby can do, and how Smalltalk has had similar features for years now. With all of the press things like JSR-223 and the DLR have been getting, I figured it was time for me to start learning some new things (I will somehow figure out how this will lead to less responsibility later).

So I looked at JRuby for a little while and got too intimidated to learn a new syntax and new language constructs. This may seem silly, but I’m afraid of everything. So in the spirit of trying to learn too little at once, I started to look into Groovy. Dick Wolf from the Java Posse is always talking about it, so I figured, maybe its an easier transition for my Java syntax mind. After doing a few tutorials and playing with the console that ships with it (cool little Java app), I got pretty comfortable, pretty fast. The syntax is based on Java with, what my Ruby friends (Tan and Dyler) would call, syntactical sugar available to make things like file IO, regular expressions, database connectivity, and collections much simpler. The availability of closures alone just made it that much easier to get into Groovy. Groovy also has the notion of formal properties so that was nice too. Oh, and Groovy is written entirely in Java and supports JSR-223 so bi-directional Java/Groovy integration is really straight forward.

In any case, after a few walkthroughs, I wanted to get some instant gratification, so I tried out Grails. Now one of the first things I noticed about Grails which was a disappointment, but not a big deal, was how slow the generation tools were. Even though you are running them a discrete number of times for an application and its just to get started … slow. Now that being said, wow this is a cool framework. I may later find that’s its not all that great, but what I thought was cool about it was I understood the technologies used to build it! The build tools and generator tools are coordinated from Ant using Ivy for dependency management. The web server that comes bundled with each app is Jetty. The framework uses Spring WebFlow as the foundation for “wire framing” the site’s paths and routing. Spring is available for use with your Java classes (and I think Groovy classes as well). The GORM project is a wrapper around Hibernate 3 that Grails uses for its scaffolding (instead of ActiveRecord as in Rails). I thought it was also pretty cool that Grails uses closures as the foundation for its framework, rather than the extension of a set of base classes. Additionally, there is a notion of services which they advise using to implement business rules, so extending an existing Java SOA would get a cinch.

Some more cool stuff about Groovy and Grails, an Eclipse plugin exists that has some helpful IDE features, the generator tools generate IDE metadata so any Grails project can be imported into Eclipse, IntelliJ, or Netbeans, and Groovy and Grails both have lots of documentation to read through. I was able to get a scaffolded site up and running and start messing with the Spring and Hibernate mapping files (for fun) in under 5 minutes.

Groovy is 1.0 and Grails is at 0.5.6, so I’m not sure if its something we could begin using at work, but it feels much more natural to bridge the Java gap than JRuby, learning curve and all. As I mess with Grails and Groovy some more I’ll try to post some code samples. Now, like a good programmer, I’m going to learn a framework before I have any real clue on how the underlying language works.

So yeah, Java on the web tier rocks, at least from the awesome assessment I just got done making from the Java Pet Store 2.0 Blueprint Implementation (JPS). My hopes were pretty high going into this project that I would see some good programming practices in the web tier that would inspire my thought process with respect to ColdFusion. Unfortunately, if the JPS application is any clue what the Java community thinks “Web 2.0″, then they’re in trouble. Here are a few things that have been giving me headaches as I’ve been going through their source code:

• Table-based layouts
• No XHTML compliance
• Gobs of Javascript code located inline within the HTML document
• AJAX implementations preached as features of JEE 5 are truly just code written to interact with the Dojo library. I have seen only one instance in my, all be it limited, analysis that showed me Javascript code generated by any Java web-tier software. ColdFusion’s AJAX integration and binding capabilities will put their implementation to shame.
• Uses an RSS control (via JSF I think) to consume an RSS feed and render it as HTML. Looks interesting but where is the RSS integration to provide feeds? How many developers, besides RSS aggregator builders, actually want to consume feeds? <cffeed> will be a welcome substitute for what they have.
• There is this crazy set of classes to encapsulate the functionality of working with Lucene for searching the site. Can’t wait to implement <cfindex> and <cfsearch> to get rid of these 7 or so classes.

Please keep in mind I am no JEE expert and although I’m excited about interacting with new specs such as JPA, I don’t know much about them. That being said, I do however feel comfortable enough with good web practices to realize that this technology demo is not web savy. I feel I understand the purpose of the JPS application as a technology demo for JEE 5, but the use of web standards that it promotes is severely lacking. What I am able to accomplish using Java in the application/business-tier is amazing and I don’t see myself deviating from that any time soon. What I am able to do with ColdFusion in the web-tier vs. what I’m seeing in the JPS definitely convinces me that I won’t be using Java for the web-tier with any of my applications.

So far the raw conversion of the JPS in Java to ColdFusion has been trying, and after 6 hours, I’m ready to take a break. Hopefully, I can motivate myself to get into the “nitty-gritty” of the Javascript code they’ve written using Dojo to see what I need to reproduce from a CF perspective to satisfy their code. I figure once I’ve gotten the app working using a very stripped down CF approach, I can begin to do what I actually wanted to do from the start … make the application actually look good and simplified.  I may skip the use case analysis because I’m not good at collecting requirements, but the UML I think can be done quickly and simply to show its benefit.